Proof starts after the rides.

There are no public rider case studies yet.

The founding-rider program has not produced a completed, consented case study that Roth can publish. The website will not fill that space with invented quotes, stock identities, projected outcomes, or a beta participant’s private feedback.

No testimonial is more trustworthy than a testimonial that did not happen.

A case study follows the whole fit—not a first impression.

A publishable Roth case study must include the supported setup, what the recordings showed, the one change tested, what was actually adjusted, the indoor recheck, and the rider’s reports after the short, medium, and normal rides.

• Starting setup and eligibility
• Recording quality and repeatability status
• Exact recommended and actual change
• Saved rollback position
• All three real-ride follow-ups
• Limits, stops, or conflicting results

Joining the beta is not permission to become marketing.

A rider can join the product beta without joining research or a case study. Roth may ask whether a rider is open to a later conversation, but publishing any name, image, bike, quote, measurement, recording frame, or result requires a separate approval of the exact final story.

• Case-study interest is optional and off by default
• The rider reviews the final words and media before publication
• Declining does not affect product access or support
• Withdrawal and correction instructions appear with the consent request

A rider story is not a universal performance claim.

Future stories will describe what one rider reported in one documented case. Roth will not turn an individual outcome into an accuracy rate, medical claim, guarantee, or promise that another rider will experience the same result.